Mr. Kavanaugh Goes To Washington

Mrs. Kavanaugh Shares His Pain

The Brett Kavanaugh story is one worthy of Hollywood if it could get its' head out of the Democrat butt.  There it lies in defense of movie people who live in fear of hate for wealth the Democrats teach America along with hates of self, success, logic, economics, science and on all in their quest for the power to tell us what to think.

The California defense for "wealth hate" is professed liberalism that is about as deep as the bird bath in a Bel Air estate under an umbrella of cultivated, imported trees that wish they had never left Hawaii. So much of "Hollywood" is fake the people in it do not know if they are real or acting like it.  Jimmy Stewart was one of the few who kept his head on straight and flew 17 missions over Germany as a B17 pilot.  He was the exception.

Brett Kavanaugh is as authentic as Jimmy Stewart and it was heartbreaking to see him struggle in his own defense, virtually naked before the nation with his loving wife looking on in pain as her man unraveled before the cameras of the world.  More people saw "Mr. Kavanaugh Goes to Washington" in two hours than the people of Earth have seen of "Mr. Smith Goes \To Washington" in the 70 years it has been showing. And, more people were moved, if not profoundly affected, in that turning point in our history. Brett Kavanaugh is destined to be one of the most significant US Supreme Court Justices of all time and we saw his birth as his lady love looked on.

All that opposes Mr. Kavanaugh is a dingy Palo Alto professor who speaks in the voice of a child, ending every utterance with an up-tick question inflection saying she is unsure.  Appearing on an unsupportable charge so shabby she cannot place it in space and time, it is an obvious fiction. 

So shallow is she in scholarship she did not know the meaning of "exculpatory!" And, she is a Stanford University Full Professor.  How much do they charge there? How much do you have to know of our language to decipher "exculpatory?"  The word tells us what it means!   "ex-cul-patory!"   This alone confirms this lady did not get her Ph.D. by scholarship.   

There are more than a few female Ph.D.'s in academia who got the degree with a great pair of legs, high heels and front row seats plus seminars in Motel Sixes: "bada-book bada-boom!"

All four of her witnesses to the alleged rape attempt deny the event  happened.  With friends like that you can find yourself in jail! The only document of that time is a note-filled calendar by the accused showing he was out of the area nearly every weekend, including the most likely date she guesses.  The note rich calendar is the only court admissible, verifiable by document experts, evidence in this entire matter!

Mrs. Blasey Ford told the Judicial Committee she could not come to Washington as she had a fear of flying, but since then we have found she has done many trips to Hawaii and the South Pacific as well as frequent flights to Washington, DC.  This alone could be prosecuted as a lie to a Committee of the US Senate even though she was not sworn when saying it.  You do not lie to a US Senate Committee official.

Mrs. Blasey Ford dropped into psycho-babble when asked what she could remember saying things like, "....it goes into the hypo-campus..." mispronouncing it saying "hippo" instead of "hypo."  Is there anything about this woman that is authentic?

Mrs. Blasey Ford claims to have seen Mark Judge, the other alleged attacker, working at a Safeway store and tried to talk to him, but he turned away.  This is totally contrary behavior for a rape attack victim as she would normally run from the scene and to the nearest police station to make a report, but at no time after the event did she make any kind of any complaint to anyone, not even her close girl friends or a diary!  Nothing!  The only explanation is that it did not happen and the Flake investigation will produce nothing.

Adrian Vance