Fried Rice

Former National Security Adviser Susan Rice categorically denies the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign or members of his transition team.  “The allegation is that somehow, Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes,” Rice told Andrea Mitchell at MSNBC, “That’s absolutely false,” in a voice recalling her Benghazi story; direct, crisp and imperative.

Famous for her five network Sunday show Benghazi tales it is all too clear there is reason to believe she led a spying effort on Mr. Trump a full year before the election.  This says Mr. Obama, and perhaps the DNC, took the Trump candidacy seriously from the very beginning. That is much to their credit and further shatters Hillary's political acumen saying, "She had not a clue!"

Rice requested at least one, and certainly several, Trump transition team members be “unmasked” in the "Bloomberg View"  piece recently revealing Mr. Obama was developing intelligence on the Trump campaign.  Where he surely did not mean to help Mr. Trump the intent was harm, and highly illegal several ways:  Susan Rice could well be indicted for numerous felonies on violations of civil rights, national security, election tampering, hate crimes where Mr. Trump is white and she blackish as there are specific laws against  what Ms. Rice did. 

“The notion, which some people are suggesting, is that by asking for the identity of the American person is the same as leaking it; that’s completely false,”  Rice said. “There is no equivalence between so-called unmasking and leaking.”  "Unmasking" is not "so-called."  It is well-defined legally and is meant to protect American citizens from being swept into investigations inadvertently while not under reasonable suspicion.  It is not proper to look for crime where there is no indication any exists, or is even likely to exist.

Ms. Rice flatly denied exposing Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, who was forced to resign in February after media reports revealed he misled Vice President Pence about his discussions with the Russian ambassador.  Flynn clearly knew he was "over the line" and tried to cover the fact.

Ms. Rice declared, “I leaked nothing to nobody,” which is a double-negative and we interpret as a declaration, "I leaked something to somebody," as she is an Ivy League graduate surely knows the intricacies of English grammar.

It appears well-documented Susan Rice knew exactly what she was doing by the testimony of elected officials Representatives Devin Nunes (R, CA) and Adam Schiff (D, CA) Minority Heads of the House Intelligence Committee.

Ms. Rice claims there is no evidence Trump Tower was "wiretapped," using an excuse handed to her by the inartful use of the technologically dated word: "wiretap."  The NSA is far more sophisticated than that in a time of WIFI, BlueTooth, Internet, Microwave, IR audio modulation and more...  The fact remains:  Susan Rice broke the law in a way requiring prosecution unless we are to admit the elected ruling class is above it and that we are expected to fall to our knees screaming, "We are not worthy!  We are not worthy!" on their arrivals.

More importantly, this is the attitude of Washington, DC and as Rush Limbaugh declares, "...it's not your money!  It's their money!  All of it!" In the America of our Founding Fathers that was not the case.

Susan Rice denied the request she testify under oath to the Congressional Committee investigating this matter "...because the request came from a Republican and not a committee including Democrats,"  Where any member of the committee can issue such an invitation, Ms. Rice is simply wrong and foolish to challenge the committee authority.  She is only asking for a quicker trip to a courtroom by thwarting these people.  A subpoena issued by a judge will soon arrive at Ms. Susan Rice door.

In her interviews Susan claims she was investigating, “very important and very serious" investigations into Russian interference in the U.S. election, but she, nor any of the "17 US investigative agencies" many Democrats now claim concur "Russia manipulated our election in favor of Donald Trump,"  none have shown any evidence or even acknowledged they were conducting such investigations.  

In three cases, it would be illegal for them do such work.  In all cases it would take a team of people and from where came the budget authorization for that?  What work did they put aside in favor of a project for which they had no authority, Executive or Congressional order?  The claim is ridiculous to all but our "major media" which is becoming no media at all with readership dropping 20% per year how long can they survive?  America is beginning to look like an episode of "South Park," a town run by ten year-olds.

The House and Senate Intelligence Committees, as well as the FBI, are all conducting probes into Russian intervention in our election. The Senate investigation is behind closed doors while the House probe is in public and making lots of TV news not helpful to the "Democratic" image as it has been exposing the likes of Dr. Rice; her spying on the Trump campaign and transition team as it was assembling.  It all makes her look rather evil.

The National Security Advisor is supposed to be working on issues, persons and places beyond our borders.  That the NSA is apparently listening to everyone offends America and that the Obama Administration turned that office into one of political espionage is felonious nine ways.  

The way to put a stop to this is make an example of Susan Rice for her crimes against the people of the United States and President Obama as he directed her, or she will fall on her sword, take full blame and spend years in Lompoc, California Club Fed with other disgraced government officials.  This is a case of fried Rice.

Adrian Vance