Stop Eating - Save The Planet!

Oxford University, England resesarchers have recommend imposing a massive tax on "carbon intensive foods:" specifically protein rich foods like red meat, to combat climate change.  They claim pricing food according to its climate impacts could save half a million lives and one billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, like exhaling and farting.  They have no data, no concept, no math, no model.  This is all "armchair, faculty lounge" nonsense and yet another part of the scam that has become the largest, full-employment program for Ph.D.s.  When will the western culture catch on that there are just as many, if not more, scoundrals and scamsters in academia as in any major city?

"Taxing greenhouse gas emissions from food production could save more emissions than are currently generated by global aviation, and lead to half a million fewer deaths from chronic diseases," according to a new study published in Nature Climate Change, again with no substantiation whatsoever.  It would not be a difficult matter to compute the amount of CO2 produced per person, multiply it by the population of the western world as we are the only offenders in the minds of the social engineers of the One World scam.

A study by researchers from the Oxford Martin Program on the Future of Food at the University of Oxford and the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington DC, "is the first global analysis to estimate the impacts that levying emissions prices on food could have on greenhouse gas emissions and human health."  Again, we say these people have published no analysis, math, etc.

They claim one billion tons of "greenhouse gases" could be avoided in the year 2020 if "emissions pricing" were implemented.   Prices would be increased with taxes.  There was no consideration of what people would actually have to eat under this regimen.

They recommended beef have a 40% tax, milk, chicken and pork 20% where vegetables, oils and other such low emission foods would only bear 10% taxes.  They claim emissions pricing would be health-promoting and they believed some adjustment could be made for countries where people are already undernourished.

 Let us say, without qualification:  This is the finest example of the insanity of "Global Warming," "Climate Change" thinking and manipulation of reality by politicians in search of more power by panic.

In the first place, there are no "greenhouse gases."  The story that CO2 gathers at the top of troposphere to trap heat energy is laughable as nothing of that kind can happen.  There is very little of anything 20 miles up much less molecules in contact to form the surface required to create the physics of a greenhouse.

A "greenhouse" is a structure with a clear glass cover such that light energy entering and absorbed by water vapor and microscopic amounts of CO2 are trapped. Most of the infrared energy rays that are re-emitted by water or CO2 molecules do not leave the greenhouse as they strike the inside surfaces such that they are reflected back into the structure.  

The physics of the greenhouse is such that light energy can only enter easily when the light rays are perpendicular to the surface, with increasing difficulty down to 45 degrees and below that are reflected back to space.  This is the feature that performs the energy trapping function of the structure as once inside only a small amount of the re-emissions can escape.  Much of the energy entering is used by the plants inside.  There is no such system in the atmosphere.  The term and myth are all part of the fraud that has been the largest full-employment system for science Ph.D.s since the nuclear weapons program.  Why do we continue to build and work on weapons "Too horrible to use?"

The people promoting this new "food tax system" may think they are doing good work, but they have not really looked at the question or examined it as the physics is simple and we demonstrate that at:
MAGIC BOTTLES,  Click on Link or use the URL: http://adrianvancearchive.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-magic-bottles.html

For less than $10, or less than $2 if you have, or access to, two laboratory "stick thermometers" you can prove for yourself that what we say is true and the complete instructions, math and modeling at that archive website produced for those with no more than high school math.  If you know a science teacher you may ask him, or her, to help as they will not only be intrigued, but we are eager to promote this truth to people who teach as they are now under the spell of the publishing industry that has capitalized on this, the greatest science fraud in history.

This fraud is a disaster many ways:  The United States government spent $550 billion from 1988 to 2000, even more annually since, giving grants that would confirm and promote the concept as there are great potentials for new taxes, bureaus, issue power that plays well in campaigns, "Save the planet!"  The problem is that CO2 is insignificant in the atmosphere and will be until we put much more into it, but there is no way that can happen if you examine the physics and chemisty.

Adrian Vance