Whether We Learn Or Not

 Dead Trees of California

Environmental groups, primarily the Sierra Club, wail about wanting everything to be "natural," claiming that everything man does, especially logging, endangers the forests.  The above picture  shows all the tinder dry dead trees that have been allowed to accumulate due to actions of the Sierra Club and Governor Jerry Moonbeam Brown.

California has routine droughts that impact trees in 1841, 1863 to  1864, 1928 to 1934, 1950 to 1953, 1958 to 1959, 1976 to1977. 1987 to 1992, and 2012 to 2016 which correlate with the solar sunspot and El Ninyo cycles as both cause season deviations.

Before neurotic environmentalism these trees would be removed by logging, create jobs, lumber and reduce home building prices. Today, removing these trees is not allowed, plus there are so many expensive regulations and permits needed for logging it is no longer sufficiently profitable to be done.

Dead trees have to be removed quickly or they lose their value for lumber due to wood rot and worm infestation thus all brown trees in the picture are worthless other than that removing them would prevent forest fires, but at taxpayer expense.  Democrats would love it as it means new taxes and bureaus for them to use as sources of free campaign workers.

California forests are now ten times as overgrown as they were in the 60’s. While it is often said this is "Federal land," it is not as often claimed.  The Federal government owns very little land, but put forests and range land under the Bureau of Land Management as it has not been purchased by the Federal Government.  They blackmail the states into this by threatening to cut Federal subsidies that only give them back their own money from Federal taxes.  This is legal corruption.

The Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution stipulates:  "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."  i.e. market value.  Thus the "Bureau of Land Management" is in each state "...at the pleasure of the state," and can be told to "Get out!" by any state Governor.   Therefore, this situation is placed completely and entirely at the feet of Governor Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown.

It has been erroneously claimed the US Government owns "most of the forests in California," but they do not.  And there is even a question about their claim on the "National Forests."  When and how much did they pay for them?  And, for what they did pay, was it proper or in question?

California has regulations about logging private land. They have made it so expensive to log private land they have bought the problem.  They are now to blame.  It is just that simple.

Since the fires Governor Brown has relaxed the regulations to more reasonable charges, but his action is "after-the-fact" so billion Dollar litigation is coming as the impacted property owners are so easily defined.

Is "climate change" responsible?  Since 1870 the average temperature has increased by 0.8 Celsius, 1.28 Fahrenheit degrees. 148 years and an amount so small it could not be determined from one year to the next.  The increase in CO2 from 280 to 400 parts per million has increased growth rates, but where that may have increased growth by 30%, as it did in corn and oranges, it only makes the quenching of wood harvest that much greater a crime!  So, the Federal and State governments are that much more complicitous and liable.  How ironic that something good for the trees turns out to be bad for the people paid to protect them.

The US Forest Service in 2014 documented that mortality for trees was rising in the West (but decreasing in other parts of the US). Much of this was linked to beetle infestation. https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/librar...

Is there a link between warmer summers and beetle infestation? There are some studies that point in that direction. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_ot...

Drought is nothing new for California. There is no doubt trees are stressed due to low moisture levels, but forests in Norther California have low moisture levels generally by mid summer.

"Greens" say there are more fires, but this is not correct. In reality, there has been a trend towards less fires in California. Over the last 40 years the number of wildfires in California has decreased, due to the decline of cigarette smoking with people tossing "butts."

While the number of fires has decreased, The size of the fires in California have increased. So what has changed in this time frame so that fires are more intense? Logging has been severely limited.

There are those saying logging will not reduce the risk of these types of fires, but it had worked for 100 years!

As for the environmental impact of logging on wildlife:  The spotted owl has been protected for 34 years, but continues in decline. One million plant and animal species vanish every year as nature moves forward.  Every species ends at some point, as will we probably to be replaced by cockroaches.  Stopping logging, at the insistence of the Sierra Club, has had no effect on the destiny of the Spotted Owl. But we know we have lost more forest area to these fires than what we did to logging.

Thus, logging will return. Jerry Brown will be gone.  The Sierra Club will fade to nothing and life will continue whether we learn, or not. 

Adrian Vance