On Monday, July 10, the Senate Appropriations Committee is scheduled to hear AB 7. Please use the TAKE ACTION button below to email the members of the Senate Appropriations Committee and urge them to OPPOSE AB 7. Also take a moment to CALL the members below to voice your OPPOSITION to AB 7.
Assembly Bill 7, sponsored by Mike Gipson (D-64), would further restrict the open carry of an unloaded firearm on public property by including unincorporated areas as prohibited places.
Committee Members that need to hear from you:
Senator Ricardo Lara (Chair) – (916) 651-4033
Senator Jim Beall – (916) 651-4015
Senator Steven Bradford – (916) 651-4035
Senator Jerry Hill – (916) 651-4013
On Tuesday, July 11, the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee is scheduled to hear AB 521. Sponsored by Assembly Member Jim Frazier (D-11), AB 521 would significantly reduce California’s high-priced resident elk tags from nearly $450 to $100 and creates an apprentice (youth) elk tag for $20 per tag. Currently, youth hunters pay the same price for elk tags as adults.
Please use our TAKE ACTION button above to email the members of the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee and urge them to SUPPORT AB 521. Also take a moment to CALL the members below to voice your SUPPORT for AB 521.
Please use our TAKE ACTION button above to email the members of the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee and urge them to SUPPORT AB 521. Also take a moment to CALL the members below to voice your SUPPORT for AB 521.
Committee Members that need to hear from you:
Senator Robert Hertzberg (Chair) – (916) 651-4018
Senator Benjamin Allen – (916) 651-4026
Senator Toni Atkins – (916) 651-4039
Senator Ben Hueso – (916) 651-4040
Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson – (916) 651-4019
Senator Bill Monning – (916) 651-4017
Senator Henry Stern – (916) 651-4027
Please continue to check your inbox and www.StandandFightCalifornia.com for updates on issues impacting your Second Amendment rights and hunting heritage in California.
-------------------------
Gentlemen:
Sorry I got this a little late, but knowing how things are done and happen in California why do I think it does not matter. If you folks ever got the "Seven Year Itch" not only would it take you 14 to scratch it out, but you'd pass one of these goofy laws about it only for the purpose of making a lot of money for the lawyers that would have to sort it out in our courts.
That magazine limitation law you recently passed is a case in point: Many of us have old semi-automatic pistols that all have 16 and 17 shot clips because the pistol designers know you have to shoot a lot to hit anything, and even then only if you are lucky. In a western gunfight the safest place to be was the opponent. If you stood sideways and pulled in your gut you were safe while you took careful aim.
Did you folks read the Second Amendment? The last four words of the amendment read, "...shall not be infringed." Now how long do you think it will take a snappy, young lawyer to challenge your stupid magazine law on the fact that outlawing magazines for more than ten bullets is not an infringement? No ten round magazines are made for our pistols as they make no sense. They are themselves an infringement which every judge knows because he has one within reach if he has any sense and they all do, be assured.
Adrian Vance
-------------------------
Gentlemen:
Sorry I got this a little late, but knowing how things are done and happen in California why do I think it does not matter. If you folks ever got the "Seven Year Itch" not only would it take you 14 to scratch it out, but you'd pass one of these goofy laws about it only for the purpose of making a lot of money for the lawyers that would have to sort it out in our courts.
That magazine limitation law you recently passed is a case in point: Many of us have old semi-automatic pistols that all have 16 and 17 shot clips because the pistol designers know you have to shoot a lot to hit anything, and even then only if you are lucky. In a western gunfight the safest place to be was the opponent. If you stood sideways and pulled in your gut you were safe while you took careful aim.
Did you folks read the Second Amendment? The last four words of the amendment read, "...shall not be infringed." Now how long do you think it will take a snappy, young lawyer to challenge your stupid magazine law on the fact that outlawing magazines for more than ten bullets is not an infringement? No ten round magazines are made for our pistols as they make no sense. They are themselves an infringement which every judge knows because he has one within reach if he has any sense and they all do, be assured.
Adrian Vance
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment and make suggestions.