From "
"Jerry Brown is your old fashioned, European
totalitarian, a dictator that does not believe in freedom. He is using as
the excuse to control your life the canard of “Climate Change”, the scam that
made Al Gore one of the richest men in America and killed the hopes and dreams
of tens of millions American. What does Brown want to do?
“California Governor Brown’s SB 32 law requiring
the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to levels 40% below levels measured
in 1990 is necessitating the development of massive numbers of new regulations
and policy that will allow the state government to control and dictate
virtually every aspect of Californian’s lives including:
(1) where and how they can
live, (2) what kind of jobs and
businesses they can work in, (3) what kind of housing they can have, (4) what kind of car they can drive (if any),
(5) how many miles can they drive,
(6) what kind of public transportation
they must use, (7) how many times they
must walk and bicycle, (8) how much and what kind of energy they can
use, (9) what kind and how food can be
farmed.”
Can you think of any reason to work, get an
education, think? This is a Fascist/totalitarian utopia—but who will pay
for it? Like the Uptopian colonies in the 19th century,
it will fail since there is no reason to work or create—land will go fallow,
new businesses will not start, people will no longer travel, wonderful food not
cooked—it will be little different than a Soviet prison camp—all using climate
change as the excuse to imprison a whole society. Ready for it?
"Climate Depot"
response: It was never about the science or environmental policy:
EU Commissioner: Global
Warming Policy Is Right Even If Science Is Wrong — ‘Regardless
of whether or not scientists are wrong on global warming, the European Union is
pursuing the correct energy policies even if they lead to higher prices,
Europe’s climate commissioner Connie Hedegaard’s has said.’ — EU’s
Hedegaard in 2013: ‘Let’s say that science, some decades from now, said ‘we
were wrong, it was not about climate’, would it not in any case have been good
to do many of things you have to do in order to combat climate change?
Hedegaard in 2013: ‘I think we have to realize that in the world of the 21st century for us to have the cheapest possible energy is not the answer.’
Flashback 1975: Obama Science Czar John Holdren Says Real Threat to USA Is Cheap Energy: ‘The U.S.is threatened far more by the hazards of too much energy, too soon, than by the hazards of too little energy, too late.’
Flashback: UN IPCC Official Edenhofer: "We Redistribute World’s Wealth By Climate Policy"
Flashback 2007: Former Czech President Vaclav Klaus: "As someone who lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism…This ideology wants to replace the free and spontaneous evolution of mankind by a sort of central (now global) planning."
Czech President Vaclav Klaus: Attempting to ‘control climate’ is as "...irrational, arrogant and pretentious as communist planning that people like me were objects of for so many years." -March 08, 2010
MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: "Flashback May 2009: Eco-Nanny Pelosi: ‘Every aspect of our lives must be subjected to an inventory."
"A planned economic
recession," Global warming prof.
Kevin Anderson – who has ‘cut back on showering’ to save planet – asserts
economic "de-growth" is needed to fight climate change —
Anderson: "Continuing with economic growth over the coming two decades is
incompatible with meeting our international obligations on climate change."
– Put simply, for the wealthier nations, "...the necessary levels of
2°C mitigation and short-to-medium term economic growth are incompatible."
Economic "degrowth’
proposed to combat climate change – Reduction in salaries does not lead to a
‘reduction in the level of happiness," — ‘Policies aimed
at effectively mitigating climate change through a reduction in economic growth
and consumption of fossil fuels would have a monetary impact on the economy,
but also an impact on the wellbeing and happiness of individuals…Dr Sekulova
highlights that the fact that “the reduction in salaries in the two years
before the survey, from 1,373 to 1,310 euros monthly in average, did not
represent a reduction in the level of happiness.’
------------------
Thanks to Stephen Frank for an excellent summary, overview of the forces driving "Climate Change," "Man-Caused Global Warming," the biggest science fraud of all time. Never in our recall have so many been so wrong and corrupt in science. This issue is quite capable of destroying western civilization.
Adrian Vance
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment and make suggestions.