Illegal Voting Is A Fact!

From Steven Frank's "California Politics"

"Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections" 

by Hans von Spakovsky, "The Daily Signal"

Heritage Foundation,   6/2/15

"Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative.   The following is his research:

A poll by John McLaughlin confirmed again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country.  Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law.  She was caught when she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes in North Carolina in 2008, and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60^th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

In 2013, McLaughlin, a Republican pollster, conducted an extensive “National Hispanic Survey” to determine the attitudes of Hispanic Americans on immigration issues. McLaughlin went to a great deal of trouble to try to make this survey as accurate as possible, including conducting 60 percent of the interviews in Spanish. In results that run counter to what mainstream media seems to think about the attitudes of Hispanics, the results showed strong support for everything from increased border security and tougher enforcement of immigration laws to “stopping undocumented immigrants who are already here from getting food stamps, welfare, Medicaid and Obamacare benefits.”

But buried in the back of the survey on page 68 is a “Voter Profile” that reveals that 13 percent of noncitizen respondents admitted they were registered to vote (a violation of state and federal law), which matches closely the Old Dominion/George Mason study finding that 14.8 percent of noncitizens admitted they were registered to vote in 2008 and 15.6 percent of noncitizens admitted they were registered in 2010.

When these numbers were adjusted to take into account various factors, such as noncitizens “who said they were not registered actually were registered,” the Old Dominion/George Mason study’s authors concluded the true percentage was probably closer to 25 percent.

There is no doubt the registration rate of noncitizens varies depending on the jurisdiction, and the percentage of those voting is likely smaller. But whether the registration rate is 13 percent as McLaughlin found or 25 percent as the Old Dominion/George Mason study estimated, there seems little doubt that there are enough noncitizens registering and voting to potentially make the difference in close elections."

Note:  John McLaughlin has recently passed on, but his integrity is well-known and his work stands.  This is authentic data and appears to conclusively prove that much more than whatever surplus Hillary Clinton had in the 2016 Presidential election was from illegal alien votes to the degree she was certainly down three to ten million and not up three million over Mr. Trump and especially considering that voting illegal aliens vote many times, eight to ten per election, even more!

This is not a trivial issue as we have been in a rising trend of illegal immigration and Democratic skullduggery that will not end where we have a better economy than most, if not all, of the world.  As well, our declining birth rate will make immigration more attractive to us in the decades to come so this is a problem if we are going to maintain the integrity of our elections.  The above is solid evidence that illegal voting is a fact.

Adrian Vance