This
Excel spreadsheet is a comparison of the predictions of the United Nation's
World Health Organization, WHO, and the Verhulst, or Logistics equation.
Antoine Verhulst was an 18th century science teacher who observed paramecia cultures increased population to a peak, then declined to zero. He could not maintain a constant culture. He tracked them by stirring vigorously, taking a sample and counting those one drop, extrapolated to find the population.
From this data he derived an equation predicting the life of a culture. With this he accurately predicted the population of the Dutch population in 1995 from 1780! His equation has been applied to other species and predicted the rise and fall accurately, but we have not seen an application to the human race. Perhaps it is not interesting politically.
Antoine Verhulst was an 18th century science teacher who observed paramecia cultures increased population to a peak, then declined to zero. He could not maintain a constant culture. He tracked them by stirring vigorously, taking a sample and counting those one drop, extrapolated to find the population.
From this data he derived an equation predicting the life of a culture. With this he accurately predicted the population of the Dutch population in 1995 from 1780! His equation has been applied to other species and predicted the rise and fall accurately, but we have not seen an application to the human race. Perhaps it is not interesting politically.
Meanwhile
back at the United Nations WHO they claim the human race will expand apace so
we ran their projection in the second column, "per WHO" while we ran
a Verhulst prediction in column five, "per Verhulst."
Nothing
sells better than dystopian books and films presenting the end of the world or
the end of the human race at the hands of space people, plague, CO2, ozone depletion, starvation or Donald Trump, if you live in
New York , Massachusetts
or California .
Meanwhile,
at the National Vital
Statistics System and Mortality agency there has been a recent release that has many
people concerned: "Life
expectancy for the U.S.
population in 2015 was 78.8 years, a decrease of 0.1 year from 2014.
The
age-adjusted death rate increased 1.2% from 724.6 deaths per 100,000 standard
population in 2014 to 733.1 in 2015.
The 10
leading causes of death in 2015 remained the same as in 2014. Age-adjusted
death rates increased for eight leading causes and decreased for one.
The infant
mortality rate of 589.5 infant deaths per 100,000 live births in 2015 was not
significantly different from the 2014 rate.
The 10 leading causes of infant death in 2015 remained
the same as in 2014, although two causes exchanged ranks. This report presents
2015 U.S.
final mortality data on deaths and death rates by demographic and medical
characteristics. These data provide information on mortality patterns among U.S. residents
by variables such as sex, race and ethnicity, and cause of death. Life
expectancy estimates, age-adjusted death rates by race and ethnicity and sex,
10 leading causes of death, and 10 leading causes of infant death were analyzed
by comparing 2015 and 2014 final data."
Meanwhile back at the spreadsheet: Notice at the top of column three, the
progressions, labeled "Progress.", increase from 1960 to 1970, which
could be an error, but decline from that point on, per the Verhulst Principle. There is a bump up in 2010, but otherwise the
trend is consistently down. We
approximate the rate to go forward all the way to 2250. What does it all mean?
We trust Verhulst and the adaptability of man far more
than the Paul Ehrlich generation of alarmist fear-mongers. The rate of population decline is now well
under way in Japan , Europe
and the middle class of America .
We feel it is possible man will realize
an equilibrium population point when science and technology are put to good use
by our people. The real challenge of the
future will be what to do with our abundance?
Adrian Vance

No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment and make suggestions.