Russia Did It?

The Kremlin, Moscow Russia

It is classic Clinton to blame Russia for Wikilink's email disclosures when they have no evidence and it is much more likely that someone, if not several, of their own people are leaking these emails out of conscience, anger, envy or disappointment with the party hierarchy. 

It is quite ordinary in criminal enterprises to have disaffected people. There are many ways they can ventilate anger, angst, frustration, disappointment and disgust with their hierarchies.  Stories of Hillary's rages, rants and right crosses abound. She is an angry, violent woman with a strong throwing arm.  Hillary is "lamp capable."

The Clinton campaign should ask and listen to the people who know about computers and hacking.  Stealing emails can be done leaving no trace.  It is like watching trucks or trains go by.  You can read what is written on them without anyone knowing.  As with books and papers, reading leaves no eyeprint.  

Tracing hackers is possible only when they plant a forwarding program in your machine. Computer "virus" and "worm" programs can be as anonymous as a fart in church.  But, these programs are written in any one of several systems, or "languages" that may give. or plant, a clue to the source, but only a clue and not a conclusion. And, it is simple matter to fake it: i.e. make it look foreign.

The only way the source can be identified is by where it sends what it copies and that can be a dead end.  Just reading a computer message leaves no trace any more than your reading a newspaper, magazine or book changes them.  Whatever is read is either clipped, which is undetectable, or sent to a "drop" forwarding address that is a dead end where it is read or clipped.  An email account under an assumed name will do.

A telling fact in all this is that no media person has ever challenged Hillary or the DNC on this issue and many in the media know enough about computers, or are associated with those that do, to know the Russian accusation is one totally without substance.  If the accusation ever becomes official you can be sure it will not include conclusive evidence of the hacker's identity.  The only hackers that have been identified are those that brag of their successes or sell their work to people who later identify them.

It would see far more logical that Russia would prefer to see Hillary as President, knowing she is incompetent, corrupt and probably not well, perhaps terminally.  If she only continues the policies of the Obama Administration "...leading from behind" they will be well off and take a few more countries knowing she will do nothing.  That she voted for the Iraq invasion was much more a "go along" decision than one arrived at by logic, considering facts or patriotism.  Hillary is not for war.  Hillary is for Hillary.

While the circumstance of electing our first "black" President contributed to the Obama election, that the major media made no attempt to discover why all his school records, from kindergarten on through law school, were sealed, the authorship of his books, his association with Chicago criminal elements, his false Social Security number, counterfeit birth certificate, check the story of his Kenyan birth and why he published that he was born in Kenya and declared he is a Muslim on YOUTUBE in three videos are facts that indict the major media in a way putting them in violation of a Constitutionally required duty to seek and publish the truth to keep America free.  All they are able to do is parrot a false accusation that "Russia did it."

Adrian Vance