Pages

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Climate Communism



Maurice Strong

The actors in the international intrigue for money and power include Maurice Strong who could play Dr. Evil without makeup in an Austin Powers movie now lives in Bejing to be near what he loves:  Communism.  He found the United Nations frustrating and is a major player in "Climate Change." 

"Climate Change" is the game of choice now that America can no longer spend trillions of Dollars for foreign wars for which the next three generations will pay.  They have already cashed out the future of your children's grandchildren. 

While they could never admit to "war for profit" they can tell us "renewable energy" will be better and cheaper, "The fuel is free!"  Then why all the borrowing?  Like everything else "free" from government, renewable energy, is far and away the most expensive they will ever see.
 
Albeit, they will pay off with "cheap money" as real annual inflation has been five percent in America, but the government claims it is near zero by Obama math, the kind with rubber numbers.  

When a 12 ounce bottle of Chili sauce we bought for 39 cents in 1965 is now over four Dollars or a pound of hamburger that cost 30 cents then is now three Dollars the compound interest equation says the real inflation rate has been 4.5%.  But, that is the least issue of the day.

Dark forces in the United Nations and national governments push the scientific community to make life difficult for scientists who dispute the idea that CO2 controls the atmosphere and is heating it beyond repair.  That the average temperature has been in decline for 17 years causes official bureaus to introduce “correction factors” that sharp junior high science clubbers could prove are lies.

Dr. Tim Ball is a former professor of climatology at the University of Winnipeg.  Ball is the author of “The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science.”  He documented how the climate-change movement roots are in the Malthusian notion the population must be cut to avoid calamities while avoiding that they are the calamity.  Their play is to demonize industrialized nations, fossil fuels and CO2.

Maurice Strong, is a former Canadian entrepreneur who ironically made his first fortune in the oil business then switched to politics and became the Undersecretary of the United Nations, the Secretary General of the UN Conference on Human Environment and the President of the University of Peace as well as head of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, setting a political agenda claiming to be backed up by the latest in climate science.  The question should be, “Why are all the top people in the “climate change” movement power mongering politicians and not independent climate scientists?”

Under Strong’s direction, the U.N. collaborated with the World Meteorological Organization to present the IPCC findings as settled science, to shame and destroy by denying funding to scientists who disagreed with their conclusions.  They have ruined hundreds of careers, destroyed science education at all levels and sent engineering over a cliff.

The systems and experimental demonstrations to prove what critics are saying of this movement are simple and easy to understand, but they are never seen. Where their alternative solutions are seen invalid, fanciful and uneconomic the last scene in this play will be written and it is not a happy ending, but it will be the story of climate communism.

Adrian Vance

1 comment:

  1. I especially liked your chili sauce and hamburger example showing 4.5%, but consider Shadow Stats (http://www.shadowstats.com/inflation_calculator?amount1=100&y1=1965&m1=7&y2=2014&m2=7&calc=Find+Out) assessment, which shows the BLS's (CPI-U) report of inflation as compounded 4.21% while Shadow Stats contends inflation was significantly more than BLS reports.

    I'm inclined to agree with Shadow Stats. Consider that chili sauce and hamburger and just about every other production has improved in many ways over the last 49 years. Improvements in production reduces prices over time, not increases. Therefore, because the price is not significantly lower, but higher suggests that the inflation rate is even more than reported, aligning with the Shadow Stats graph, because the base in 1965 should have decreased.

    ReplyDelete

Please comment and make suggestions.